“Quasiscience” may be a useful term for a field somewhere between science and pseudoscience. The foundations are dubious and the whole thing may be nonsense. There well may be some real stuff there, but it’s impossible to sort out which, given the methods used.
I know you tweeted some stuff and papers about it, but is there a tldr/ELI5 of the key difference there?
-
-
Quite! What is valued in a paper being written by an NSF funded basic science lab to be published in a basic science/psychology journal is extremely different from being funded by NIH for collecting clinical data that you plan to publish in a medical journal.
-
You might write a tome that is extremely thorough and detailed about one tiny methodological decision in the former, whereas it might constitute a sentence if one at all in the latter.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.