I *think* what’s happening is that Girard had a Straussian temperament/great man complex going. Or something like that.
Conversation
There’s no easy way to prove or disprove such a metaphysical theory, but there are indicative arguments. For example, all my mimetic desire is borrowings from genre fiction. But it manifests as a desire to (say) make up plots that mash up wildly different authors.
1
2
I am trying to write comic surreal sci-fi mystery stuff that borrows tricks from Hitchhikers Guide, Poirot novels, Sherlock Holmes, Asimov, Star Trek, etc. I don’t even know what it would mean to want to “be” a mashup of those authors.
2
3
Only special case where the theory works is around the works of Straussian great man types. Perhaps their works are like unique signatures, so you can only want what they wanted by wanting to be them. Ie mimetic desire sparked by reading a Shakespeare play is maybe Girardian.
2
But generic mimetic desire, sparked by a genre product (ice cream, mystery novels) by definition cannot be Girardian because there’s no model/mediator there to want to “be”. And desire mostly comes in “genres” in a mass consumerist economy populated by Mass Man types (Ortega)
1
5
It seems like Girard (and still working off Wikipedia level gloss here, he hasn’t yet earned the right to deeper attention from me) just defines away anything that doesn’t fit as a “mere” appetite. There’s just no such sharp distinction between appetite and desire.
2
2
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Replying to
Yeah you’re a Straussian snob alright. Get back to your island, shoo.
1
And fuck off with the patronizing bs posture, it’s become a habit with you.
1
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
