For example, one I think I grok goes: Virginia Woolf —> Hannah Arendt —> Ursula Le Guin, Donna Harroway (temporality approach) Or Simone de Beauvoir —> Betty Friedan —> Judith Butler (“other” theory/identity-constructionist approach) Does this make any sense?
-
-
Show this thread
-
I read Friedan and part of Beauvoir out of “need to grok female viewpoint” motive in my early 20s. Not strong enough a motive to get far. Renewed interest now is narrower and not about women so much as temporality where women thinkers seem to have had unusual amount to say.
Show this thread -
Maybe men think in space by default while women think in time by default
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
the waves model captures that there are multiple feminisms existing alongside one another, and sometimes disagreeing on key points. do you have a timeline that includes kristeva or irigiray?
-
I don't know anything about them. Would take a feminism scholar to test whether a timeline organization works better than a waves organization. To me, a waves organization seems to be by era/generation. Cohort based rather than genealogically based.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.