Many conceptual errors result from assuming that the truth is systematically aligned with either power or lack of power. Even the weaker assumption that it is a predictable function of present power distributions is usually a mistake.
-
-
i had a model a while back of "layers of truth" that kinda went • things that happened (history) • things that happen (physics) • stories about the first two plus other stories (power-driven hermeneutics)
-
anyway power gives you a lot of influence over categories 1 and 3 (and might make you think you can influence category 2)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.