The galaxy brain version of this question would be “after adjusting for your foresight into consequences” Choosing inconvenience doesn’t count if you do it to avoid a greater long-term net inconvenience. Ie it has to be choosing higher NPV of path inconvenience for “growth”.https://twitter.com/vgr/status/1133603441790443520 …
-
-
Those things are first adopted by the convenience seeking iconoclasts, and go through 5 stages of sour grapes before mainstream adoption
-
I'm not sure food preservation is a "want" vs. need, there's some nuance missing in this generalization
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.