Conversation

The galaxy brain version of this question would be “after adjusting for your foresight into consequences” Choosing inconvenience doesn’t count if you do it to avoid a greater long-term net inconvenience. Ie it has to be choosing higher NPV of path inconvenience for “growth”.
Quote Tweet
Ah found the right question for what I’m actually drilling for. What was the top example in your life when you choose inconvenience over convenience when you didn’t have to? How did it turn out?
Show this thread
6
8
I think I understand this better now. Convenience is always a satisficing choice. If all you care about is “good enough” on a few dimensions, many candidates fit, and the slack can be cashed out as saved energy. Inconvenience = desiring something unique that costs what it costs.
2
11
Replying to
Oh interesting. Yeah, I tend to imagine very precise outcomes leaving few choices so yeah, I guess most everything I do is inconvenient too. I'm better now at heading off inconvenient choices that are also ridiculous
1
1
Replying to and
Depending on where you are, the path of maximal interestingness may map to things that look unambitious and laid-back or hyper ambitious and focused. Good news is Kyle keeps similar routine in both cases 😎
4