The galaxy brain version of this question would be “after adjusting for your foresight into consequences” Choosing inconvenience doesn’t count if you do it to avoid a greater long-term net inconvenience. Ie it has to be choosing higher NPV of path inconvenience for “growth”.https://twitter.com/vgr/status/1133603441790443520 …
-
-
Rockefeller would go home after lunch and send telegrams while working on his landscaping. My kind of guy!

-
Depending on where you are, the path of maximal interestingness may map to things that look unambitious and laid-back or hyper ambitious and focused. Good news is Kyle keeps similar routine in both cases
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.