What if national media lumpencommentariat were required to declare signature-campaign data for things they say with posture of “speaking for group X”? As in “David Brooks (1 million bobo signatures)” “Brooklynite writing in New Yorker (10k high-adversity-index signatures)”
-
-
Replying to @vgr
like all regulation it would benefit large institutional actors in totally foreseeable yet hilarious ways
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @literalbanana
How many signatures do you have backing up that take?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @literalbanana
Yeah you’re not fit for populist lumpencommentariat membership
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @vgr @literalbanana
Oh I just got the loch ness monster ref
5:59 PM - 26 May 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.