What if national media lumpencommentariat were required to declare signature-campaign data for things they say with posture of “speaking for group X”?
As in
“David Brooks (1 million bobo signatures)”
“Brooklynite writing in New Yorker (10k high-adversity-index signatures)”
Conversation
Replying to
like all regulation it would benefit large institutional actors in totally foreseeable yet hilarious ways
1
5
Replying to
Yeah you’re not fit for populist lumpencommentariat membership
1
1
Show replies

