A twist on various favorite author/book prompt games is to assume good compression and summarization. Example if you had 100 standard-sized books (and 1 book = 20 good Wikipedia glosses), how much would you allocate to actual books? Respond with glimpses of your compressions.
-
-
This game is probably too complex to play on Twitter The Compressed Knapsack problem
Show this thread -
Nice thing about this game is it goes beyond pure signaling and forces you to think a bit past include/exclude
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No, probably all theology down to a single Wikipedia article hitchhikers guide
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Isn't this counterintuitive to the existence of material as recreational content? Doesn't it reduce their existence to being sheer tools used as a means to an end that is not frivolous in nature? Rhetorically assuming of course, that frivolity is a virtue.
-
You can summarize to improve the recreational value too!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.