Conversation

A twist on various favorite author/book prompt games is to assume good compression and summarization. Example if you had 100 standard-sized books (and 1 book = 20 good Wikipedia glosses), how much would you allocate to actual books? Respond with glimpses of your compressions.
Replying to
Glimpses of mine: - HHG down to 1 volume - Shakespeare = 1 volume of quotes - All philosophy = 1 summary volume - Top 3 Christie mysteries, uncompressed - Most social/cultural/humanities theorizing summarized at “mostly harmless” level - 50 books worth of Wikipedia summaries
2
6
Replying to
I don't understand what you want glimpses of, but I think 0% is optimal.
Quote Tweet
Why I ~only read book summaries/notes. A thread on the Pareto Principle applied to reading. (To "80/20" this thread, just read 7 and 9.)
Show this thread
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Show replies
Replying to
The problem is books contain experiences and not just information. Cutting out experiences can make it harder for people to absorb the content and can create the illusion of knowledge/wisdom without operating ability.