Conversation

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Replying to
I think something interesting going on. There’s a faction that thinks it is pro-trade but against the international rules based order, and wants a condition of Hobbesian bilateralism where there are no stable arrangements and some sort of mercantilist zero-sum realpolitik.
2
9
Replying to and
This faction seems to have 2 broad strategic goals: cut down what they see as China’s unfair maneuvering and weaken what they see as bureaucratic intermediary multilateral orgs especially Europe-based.
1
3
Replying to and
What they miss is that the global economy isn’t a random trade network with lots of choice of trading partners for everything but an organic structure with players cast in very specific roles carved out by historic and geographic contingency, plus cultural affinities.
Replying to and
It’s a bit like a decrepit, broke, precariously employed 55 year old divorcing wife of 20y and abandoning kids by talking himself into believing there’s a world of hot 22 year olds just waiting for him if he just works out a bit (aka steel-making) and gets hair implants (moon!)
2
10
Replying to and
The big dissonance is that they think a version of “fair” free trade is achievable with 19th century style bilateral protectionism via weaponized tariffs and barriers. This strikes me as a sad middle-aged incel trying to learn PUA tricks and larping bronze-Age-paleo bs.
1
11
Show replies
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more