The Abstract Bogeyman. An idea I am playing with. Whether it is Empire (Hardt/Negri), The Cathedral (Moldbug), Spectacle (Debord) or Kyriarchy (Fiorenza), the Abstract Bogeyman is the "bad guy" in a given narrative that is the source of most if not all problems in the world.
Conversation
Replying to
Is the distinction from non-abstract that nobody espouses it? There are people who claim to be communist, capitalist, Islamic etc, and offer counter-bogeyman defensive accounts of those abstractions. Nobody does that for ‘cathedral’ etc because nobody identifies with it.
3
3
A non-abstract bogeyman might be Hitler, who was a specific person at a specific point in time. Whereas Nazism is an abstract bogeyman.
1
hmm otoh there are actually people who literally espouse it and go around sieg heiling. I forget who said it, but ironic fascism is also fascism etc. So not entirely a bogeyman. But probably an overstated threat in 2019 as opposed to 1933.
There’s a difference between ‘abstract’ and ‘fake’.


