The answer is Moar Big Histories! http://webseitz.fluxent.com/wiki/HistoryOfHistories …
-
-
-
"Infinite Number of Meaningless Factoids" is now the working title of my own Big History.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Strikes me more as the standard example of "Here's why I hate this book that refuses to kowtow to my particular theory of the world". For the next N years, to be taken seriously by the NYT your book will have to put kyriarchy front and center, regardless of its subject matter.
-
Basically no different from complaining in 1860 that Darwin sucked because he doesn't talk about god enough. (I make no comment on Upheaval, which I haven't read; this is a comment about the review.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.