“Misleading/needs context” seems to be an epistemic status that’s neither truth, nor lie, nor bullshit (ie indifferent to truth/falsehood). This type of assertion needs a name and some theorizing/steelmanning. Very unsatisfying/weak to accuse someone of this. Like “you’re mean!”
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @vgr
asserting the frame isn't wide enough is fine... as long as it's finite and not recursive thoughtfully considering something within a larger narrative is probably useful... as long as that's not the only narrative under consideration
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HiredThought @vgr
"de-contextualized" feels like "needs deliberate disordering" in Cynefinspeak
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @HiredThought @BenMosior
There’s more than a misframing accusation though. It is something like a camouflaging accusation. It’s like telling a chameleon, “you’re choosing a skin color to blend in with the rocks”. Bad-faith situating to exploit affordances of the context.
9:10 AM - 20 May 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.