Books that “work”, (not necessarily good): - Math books with > 70% exercises - Genre fiction that respects > 80% of conventions - stream of consciousness - random-access ref books - “Idea museum” books like GEB - Atmospheric fiction (mood prose) - Straight-up history - Poetry
-
Show this thread
-
“Work” as in there is a learnable construction method that produces a predictable access/use behavior on the part of the reader, which has a somewhat predictable before/after effect on their cognitive condition that is close to what writer intended
2 replies 0 retweets 14 likesShow this thread -
More... - red-pill books (radicalizing/false-conscious creation-destruction) - traditional plays (but not necessarily TV/movie scripts) - minimalist comic books (complex ones may be good but they don’t “work” reliably) In general a book “works” if it induces a “literacy”
1 reply 0 retweets 16 likesShow this thread
Literacy should be considered a collection of highly specific medium-unlocking adaptations, not a generic symbol processing cognitive ability. You’re not literate in “English” but in something like “mystery novels” or “Japanese style comic books”.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.