Conversation

Context with information and insight is necessary. Finding a path for dialectic or synthesis requires patient exploration. Its absence causes clashes through argument and debate through conflict. To avoid that on this thread, here's my context + canvas :) Dissect + question away!
Image
1
6
Searching for a common why with 1.25 billion people can be hard. Rights (De jure) and Outcomes (De facto) are frequently pitted against each other. A fractal local approach with our fundamental duties as a vector might be able to do a better job of finding all of us a common why.
Image
1
6
Looking at the problem as a technologist and math enthusiast, problems can be seen as local/fractal vector spaces, whilst solutions should be stackable, with truth, ethics, aesthetic and dialectic dimensions. Data availability and quality should be central to insight generation.
Image
1
4
Why 13? Because 10 is an indoctrinated base in religion and mathematics, 11 can be left for Pascalian fundamental duties, 12 got taken over by Jordan Peterson and 13 needed a makeover :) Lucky? Because our public problems needs a lot of it despite right ideas, teams + execution!
Image
1
8
I broke the presentation down using 's Unflattening Hobbes article for structure on individual/collective, looked at some key institutions that could use technological help and shared learnings from state, market, and society. Here are three ideas of mine for the individual.
Image
2
4
Replying to
:) Big fan! Still writing my Art of the Longform submission on various word documents. Hope to complete something useful and interesting this year!
1