Do you have a link?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
- Show replies
-
-
-
Can an "online beef" be *genuine*? I'd say that any beef that let's each party strengthen their brand (a la Taleb v Pinker), is not genuine. I posit that "beefs" are bullshit by design.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Taleb v. Pinker was the example I immediately thought of, but I'd add the Elon Musk v. Pinker debate on whether AI is a risk:https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/01/elon-musk-responds-to-harvard-professor-steven-pinkers-a-i-comments.html …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Difficult because many times due to butthurt, tweets get deleted Would really like something like this though. Taleb beefs are like UFC PPVs for mehttps://twitter.com/productite/status/1106712484591730688?s=21 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@StatModeling vs@yudapearl on causal inference is a recent one https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2019/01/08/book-pearl-mackenzie/ … -
1.8.19
@11:59pm – Gelman’s review of#Bookofwhy should be of interest because it represents an attitude that paralyzes wide circles of statistical researchers. My reaction is now posted on https://bit.ly/2H3BH3b Related posts: https://ucla.in/2sgzkPZ and https://ucla.in/2v72QK5
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Gary Taubes vs Stephan Guyenet on the impact of sugar and carbs on health JRE link attached (Somewhat hard to watch): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vA3QavPp1Ho …
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.