Why are we seeing this? I have a theory. This is a generation that was raised in the cult of doerism. Hands-on everything. Trial-and-error. Gamified pedagogy. Self-directed learning. Hacking as growing up. They’ve been taught to distrust theory, reflection and contemplation.
-
Show this thread
-
This works great for a lot of stuff industrial schooling is supposed to teach, but fails to. People < 25 are used to their developmental environment world being figure-outable by trial and error, without manuals. Reflection is the all-else-fails option.
2 replies 0 retweets 13 likesShow this thread -
What happens when you throw a doerist mindset into the much more complex and ambiguous world of adult society where most things aren’t set up to be learnable through trial-and-error doing? You’re likely to quickly find, imitate, and lock-on to, the simplest patterns that work.
3 replies 0 retweets 15 likesShow this thread -
Normal 14-25 ways of growing aren’t doerist. They include wild speculation, unreasonable experiments, weird obsessions, rebellion, etc. The space explored is much larger than efficiently learnable doerist space. It includes lots of angsty contemplation, inaction, reflection.
2 replies 0 retweets 16 likesShow this thread -
It isn’t all efficient test-driven trial-and-error learning. It has a lot of potential for breaking out of tradition because it is *bad* at tradition. Tradition is something youth settles into at 35 as it runs out of energy rather than locks on to at 19 after A/B testing of chaos
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likesShow this thread -
Maybe I’m overfitting some very limited and sparse observational data, but I think there’s something real here. Something analogous, in fact, to deep learning AIs. Gen Z is deep-learning the world rather than GOFAI-learning it like every previous generation.
1 reply 0 retweets 19 likesShow this thread -
It might seem weird to call this traditionalism, since the *content* is not necessarily traditional. It’s some uncanny valley memetic soup mixing ancient statuary, “classical” aesthetics, anime, black reaction gifs etc. But the low-energy signature is that of traditionalism.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
Is this good or bad? I don’t know. It’s like asking if deep learning is good or bad vis-a-vis GOFAI. I am trying to resist my own sense that it is bad. I’m trying to see how it might be adaptive. But it’s hard not to sense the cost being incurred.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
I can’t resist the sense that this is a prematurely aged, prematurely optimized, pattern-locked generation that has been *too good* at learning for its own good. That I was perhaps well-served by my learning environment being “bad”, anti-doerist, and forcing reflection.
5 replies 3 retweets 23 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @vgr
Simpler explanation: they are hunkering down for completely rational reasons. You are asking where did genz adventurism go in this era, like a child asks where birds go when it rains.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
That’s not a simpler explanation. It’s the cause-and-effect of the same explanation. I’m merely exploring the precise mechanism by which cause led to effect.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.