Well, but, 1 is able to do evil mostly because of 3s. If you don't know what you're looking at you give the benefit of the doubt and don't guard against the worst effects. Bad actors take advantage of this.
3 types of evil 1. Genetic, psychopath NPD or whatever 2. Evil born of having never being exposed to good 3. Evil born of trying to do/be good without having ever encountered evil Type 3 is by far the worst. Good and evil categories of convenience here, not fundamental
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
With few extreme exceptions, my argument for why there is no evil:https://mobile.twitter.com/ideafaktory/status/952756640683618304 …
-
And why measuring 'evil' based on intent, rather than outcome, is often a bad idea.https://mobile.twitter.com/ideafaktory/status/750424298662334464 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Nice refactor
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What worst means here? Social impact?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Are you rejecting the idea that Evil could be exposed to good and reject it? Thereby remaining evil?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Melkor: Bro, let me out, I'll be good. Manwë: seems legit. ("For Manwë was free from evil and could not comprehend it...")
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.