Preskoči na sadržaj
Korištenjem servisa na Twitteru pristajete na korištenje kolačića. Twitter i partneri rade globalno te koriste kolačiće za analize, personalizaciju i oglase.

Za najbolje sučelje na Twitteru koristite Microsoft Edge ili instalirajte aplikaciju Twitter iz trgovine Microsoft Store.

  • Naslovnica Naslovnica Naslovnica, trenutna stranica.
  • O Twitteru

Spremljena pretraživanja

  • obriši
  • U ovom razgovoru
    Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
Predloženi korisnici
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Jezik: Hrvatski
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • Ελληνικά
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Imate račun? Prijava
    Imate račun?
    · Zaboravili ste lozinku?

    Novi ste na Twitteru?
    Registrirajte se
Profil korisnika/ce vgr
Venkatesh Rao
Venkatesh Rao
Venkatesh Rao
@vgr

Tweets

Venkatesh Rao

@vgr

This is my conversational account. For my work follow @ribbonfarm, @breaking_smart, @artofgig. Tweets are 90% vacuous views, apathetically held. Mediocritopian.

Los Angeles, CA
venkateshrao.com
Vrijeme pridruživanja: kolovoz 2007.

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • O Twitteru
  • Centar za pomoć
  • Uvjeti
  • Pravila o privatnosti
  • Imprint
  • Kolačići
  • Informacije o oglasima
Odbaci
Prethodni
Sljedeće

Idite na profil osobe

Spremljena pretraživanja

  • obriši
  • U ovom razgovoru
    Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
Predloženi korisnici
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @

Odjava

Blokiraj

  • Objavi Tweet s lokacijom

    U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više

    Vaši popisi

    Izradi novi popis


    Manje od 100 znakova, neobavezno

    Privatnost

    Kopiraj vezu u tweet

    Ugradi ovaj Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Dodajte ovaj Tweet na svoje web-mjesto kopiranjem koda u nastavku. Saznajte više

    Dodajte ovaj videozapis na svoje web-mjesto kopiranjem koda u nastavku. Saznajte više

    Hm, došlo je do problema prilikom povezivanja s poslužiteljem.

    Integracijom Twitterova sadržaja u svoje web-mjesto ili aplikaciju prihvaćate Twitterov Ugovor za programere i Pravila za programere.

    Pregled

    Razlog prikaza oglasa

    Prijavi se na Twitter

    · Zaboravili ste lozinku?
    Nemate račun? Registrirajte se »

    Prijavite se na Twitter

    Niste na Twitteru? Registrirajte se, uključite se u stvari koje vas zanimaju, i dobivajte promjene čim se dogode.

    Registrirajte se
    Imate račun? Prijava »

    Dvosmjerni (slanje i primanje) kratki kodovi:

    Država Kod Samo za korisnike
    Sjedinjene Američke Države 40404 (bilo koje)
    Kanada 21212 (bilo koje)
    Ujedinjeno Kraljevstvo 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Irska 51210 Vodafone, O2
    Indija 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonezija 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italija 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » Pogledajte SMS kratke šifre za druge zemlje

    Potvrda

     

    Dobro došli kući!

    Vremenska crta mjesto je na kojem ćete provesti najviše vremena i bez odgode dobivati novosti o svemu što vam je važno.

    Tweetovi vam ne valjaju?

    Prijeđite pokazivačem preko slike profila pa kliknite gumb Pratim da biste prestali pratiti neki račun.

    Kažite mnogo uz malo riječi

    Kada vidite Tweet koji volite, dodirnite srce – to osobi koja ga je napisala daje do znanja da vam se sviđa.

    Proširite glas

    Najbolji je način da podijelite nečiji Tweet s osobama koje vas prate prosljeđivanje. Dodirnite ikonu da biste smjesta poslali.

    Pridruži se razgovoru

    Pomoću odgovora dodajte sve što mislite o nekom tweetu. Pronađite temu koja vam je važna i uključite se.

    Saznajte najnovije vijesti

    Bez odgode pogledajte o čemu ljudi razgovaraju.

    Pratite više onoga što vam se sviđa

    Pratite više računa da biste dobivali novosti o temama do kojih vam je stalo.

    Saznajte što se događa

    Bez odgode pogledajte najnovije razgovore o bilo kojoj temi.

    Ne propustite nijedan aktualni događaj

    Bez odgode pratite kako se razvijaju događaji koje pratite.

    1. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 5. svi 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      A megatrend hypothesis inspired by several microtrend that I think are related: a) waldenponding b) rise of heavy duty information management methods like @fortelabs BASB (build a second brain) c) conversational media eating authorial media d) "hivebrain" jokes/references

      16 replies 82 proslijeđena tweeta 375 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    2. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 5. svi 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      If you put it together, you reach a megatrend conclusion: if you do not build a second brain or go offline, you will BECOME the second brain

      12 proslijeđenih tweetova 88 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    3. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 5. svi 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      What do I mean. Basically, there's no way to actually handle the volume of information and news that all of us appear to be handling right now. Which means we are getting augmented cognition resources from somewhere. The default place is "social" media.

      11 proslijeđenih tweetova 95 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    4. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 5. svi 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      The ersatz "social" functions of social media are not actually meeting social needs. Yet we indulge in them heavily. Hypothesis 1: Evil addictive UX dark pattern grumble grumble ads hacked muh brain I'm going living in a log cabin Hypothesis 2: They are meeting other needs

      6 proslijeđenih tweetova 74 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    5. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 5. svi 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      There's been a round of pretentious commentary in old media about how Twitter isn't actually very representative blah blah blah. They're missing the point. Those who endure and stay on here are neither meeting social needs, nor imagining they are "representative" of zeitgeist

      5 proslijeđenih tweetova 51 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    6. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 5. svi 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      What those of us who are here are doing is making a deal with the devil (or an angel): in return for being 1-2 years ahead of curve, we play 2nd brain to a shared first brain. We've ceded control of executive attention not to evil companies, but... an emergent oracular brain

      5 replies 25 proslijeđenih tweetova 171 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    7. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 5. svi 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      I called it playing your part in the Global Social Computer in the Cloud (GSCITC). This has now become a much more important part of the argument I'm developing. If you don't build your own 2nd brain, the GSCITC *is* your first brain and the one in your skull is your 2nd brain.

      9 proslijeđenih tweetova 96 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    8. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 5. svi 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      What can we say about the GSCITC? 1. It is neither good nor evil, it just is 2. It is not smarter or dumber than humans (ie not an AGI or anything), just different 3. Its primary superpower is knowing the future 4. It is comparable to things like "the market"

      5 replies 5 proslijeđenih tweetova 90 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
      Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 5. svi 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      Ccentral trade-off in managing your participation in GSCITC is: The more you attempt to consciously curate your participation rather than letting it set your priorities, the less oracular power you get in return. Waldenponding, BASB, and unmanaged use are 3 points on a spectrum.

      12:40 - 5. svi 2019.
      • 5 proslijeđenih tweetova
      • 44 oznake „sviđa mi se”
      • César Astudillo Alex Schleber 👽👌 knlae krish Symora ꙮ Rahul Ramchandani Matt "optimizing for comfort" Olson Ian Hines Sam Havens
      5 proslijeđenih tweetova 44 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        1. Novi razgovor
        2. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 5. svi 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          If you choose to unplug completely (and or, do a draconian discipline of extremely tightly curated following, time-budgeting etc) you get zero temporal leverage. At best you'll live int he same present as say readers of the NYT or viewers of Fox News.

          1 reply 5 proslijeđenih tweetova 56 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        3. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 5. svi 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          If you build a high-maintenance 2nd-brain (whether it is making Anki cards out of everything, or using Tiago's BASB model), you'll give up some temporal leverage in return for 1st brain agency. You get (say) 1 year future-vision but less personal agency than waldenponders.

          1 reply 3 proslijeđena tweeta 52 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        4. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 5. svi 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          And finally, if you choose to be completely unmanaged in your use of social media, letting the winds of The Discourse drive what you do, you give up first-brain agency, but in return you get as much oracular power as the GSCITC as it has available to deliver. The Gonzo option.

          1 reply 6 proslijeđenih tweetova 65 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        5. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 5. svi 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          You can actually extrapolate this model backwards through old media. If waldenponding puts you at zero temporal leverage, relying purely on (say) The Economist, which is about 6 months lag, goes into negative territory.

          2 proslijeđena tweeta 34 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        6. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 5. svi 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          In general, temporal leverage can range from +2 years to -3000 years (if all you read are ancient Greek classics). The more reactionary you get, the more you need some *other* source of leverage to make up agency deficit. That wallowing in Greek classics better generate alpha.

          6 proslijeđenih tweetova 52 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        7. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 5. svi 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          Can you barbell your way out of this tradeoff? I like barbell thinking for many things but not for temporal agency. A portfolio of 90% greek classics and 10% shitposts just isn't going to do the trick... because the oracular agency of GSCITC participation has sharp thresholds

          5 proslijeđenih tweetova 47 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        8. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 5. svi 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          This addresses my main problem with waldenponding. To the extent *any* kind of thinking requires an input stream to work with, you can't arbitrarily decide a certain degree of retreat from "live" and a certain "deep work project" will be a net positive returns portfolio.

          1 reply 3 proslijeđena tweeta 33 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        9. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 5. svi 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          I have never had a problem with social media being a "distraction". My gonzo retreat/approach radar for intuitively calibrating how to balance my temporal leverage portfolio has been pretty good. And more importantly, requires no "addiction management" type behaviors.

          1 reply 3 proslijeđena tweeta 37 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        10. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 5. svi 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          I find that when I do get sucked into a longer project, I naturally retreat exactly as much as needed to "feed" that project the info stream it needs. If I need to spend more time with 10-year-old books I naturally do that.

          4 proslijeđena tweeta 30 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        11. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 5. svi 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          This isn't a superpower. It's evidence the addiction hypothesis is much weaker than it looks. And that for nearly any subject, there is a shit ton more signal in the GSCITC than you might assume. Sign: output from "deep work" is generally very underwhelming.

          7 proslijeđenih tweetova 66 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        12. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 5. svi 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          I have been generally very unimpressed with the work people seem to generate when they go waldenponding to work on supposedly important things. The comparable people who stay more plugged in seem to produce better work.

          7 replies 4 proslijeđena tweeta 82 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        13. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 5. svi 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          My kindest reading of people who retreat so far it actually compromises their work is that it is a mental health preservation move because they can't handle the optimum GSCITC immersion for their project. Their work could be improved if they had the stomach for more gonzo-nausea.

          3 proslijeđena tweeta 56 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        14. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 5. svi 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          My harshest reading is that they're narcissistic snowflakes who overvalue their work simply because they did it.

          1 proslijeđeni tweet 40 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        15. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 5. svi 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          So my recommendations would be: develop an intuitive ability to tune your GSCITC immersion from full-retreat if you got a big grant to do some work only 3 other people in the world understand... to full-speed-ahead gonzo immersion if you need 2y oracular foresight

          1 reply 3 proslijeđena tweeta 50 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        16. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 5. svi 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          If you find your natural brain has a comfort zone, then build a second brain that equilibrates it there, and use it more or less as you need to wander from that set-point.

          1 reply 4 proslijeđena tweeta 27 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        17. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 5. svi 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          One reason I haven't invested in building as strong a BASB as many is simply that my comfort set-point is mostly near the gonzo edge. I need the full 2+ year foresight potential of the GSCITC for the thinking I'm most effective at. If it means continuous partial PTSD so be it.

          1 reply 3 proslijeđena tweeta 42 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        18. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 5. svi 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          One sign of the cost of this tradeoff. Though I can see this thread would be nice to put into a blog post, I don't feel like I can conjure up the energy to do it. It will likely remain in this context, only accessible and grokkable to people who are also in a roughly gonzo place

          2 proslijeđena tweeta 76 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        19. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 5. svi 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          And also, I need a better term than GSCITC... but something without baggage. Hive mind, borg, AGI, efficient narrative marketplace... all the terms I've been able to think of have inappropriate or misleading connotations.

          9 replies 1 proslijeđeni tweet 28 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        20. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 5. svi 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          For those who came in late... this train of thought began with my Against Waldenponding newsletter last yearhttps://mailchi.mp/ribbonfarm/against-waldenponding …

          1 proslijeđeni tweet 53 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        21. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 5. svi 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          Which I recently added a Part 2 to...https://us1.campaign-archive.com/?u=78cbbb7f2882629a5157fa593&id=098f100576 …

          1 proslijeđeni tweet 33 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        22. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 5. svi 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          The Waldenponding newsletters were Oct 2018 and April 2019. I think I first broached this topic even earlier in this newsletter. Your Passport to the Metabrain (Jan 2017). Shit, this has been on my 2nd brain for a long time.https://us1.campaign-archive.com/?u=78cbbb7f2882629a5157fa593&id=0f299f9100 …

          1 reply 2 proslijeđena tweeta 22 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        23. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 5. svi 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          The cost of being in gonzo mode online is admittedly quite high. The effect on more retreated modes of production (essays, books, products) is very noticeable. My best thinking in the last few years has been on twitter, but the reach is far lower than my blog or newsletter

          2 proslijeđena tweeta 51 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        24. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 5. svi 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          Final point: you are almost certainly overvaluing information from history and undervaluing information being processed live in the GSCITC for *any* project you take on. Why do I think that? At some point AlphaGoZero discarded all human history of Go playing and went full gonzo

          14 proslijeđenih tweetova 82 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        25. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 5. svi 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          This is a form of temporal egotism. We have identities anchored in personal/collective history, and we like to think distribution we are attached to is the distribution of input value. Chances are, an AI approaching any given problem you take on will throw away most of history.

          6 proslijeđenih tweetova 51 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        26. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 5. svi 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          Final final point. I flagged conversational media eating authorial media. This has been my personal ego challenge. It is hard to admit, having spent 10y building up an identity/vanity around my longform, that my conversational thinking embedded in the GSCITC is better quality.

          9 replies 1 proslijeđeni tweet 53 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        27. Kraj razgovora

      Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

      Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

        Sponzorirani tweet

        false

        • © 2020 Twitter
        • O Twitteru
        • Centar za pomoć
        • Uvjeti
        • Pravila o privatnosti
        • Imprint
        • Kolačići
        • Informacije o oglasima