Conversation

Replying to
You can see this trajectory particularly clearly in prolific but not technical-genius fiction writers like Asimov. The genre-busting through-line is visible in the canon, and the technical skills steadily improve over decades, until his last books are technically good too
1
3
I think Asimov's genre-busting innovation was to mash up science and history. By contrast, H. G. Wells and Jules Verne novels seemed to be kinda ahistorical. Asimov didn't just invent a time machine concept like Wells. He offered epic histories of robotics, and psychohistory.
1
8
My 3rd story, LEAP, which is also chapter 1 of a stalled novel, I think has both ok technical quality and a genre-busting vector (time travel scifi and identity/consciousness metaphysics). I have the plot worked out. It's just beyond my execution rn
1
1
But back to the general point. My own example makes this yin-yang dynamic (genre busting versus technical perfection) painfully, embarrassingly obvious, but it is visible even at the most accomplished and mature levels of the work of people with way more talent and experience.
1
1
And the funny thing is, I have seen almost no good advice on solving or even acknowledging this problem. 70% of fiction writing advice focuses on tactical mechanics. The other 30% tries to finesse the genre-busting problem with color-by-numbers narrative templates.
4
4
Replying to
One piece of writing advice that stood out to me was from Ian Fleming. He said something along the lines of "write wish fulfillment" and I realized at that moment that the James Bond novels were that for him. They are not even close to wish fulfillment for me.
1
1
Replying to
Your a supersmell powers, with the associated downsides! It’s quite amazing. I’m sure you could mine that for general insight by treating it as an allegory for any heightened sensitivity.
1