Pluralism is no longer strong enough to counter ideologism. We need hyperpluralism. If pluralism is a "live and let live" stance that acknowledges the right of all ideologies to exist, hyperpluralism requires all ideologies to be open-sourced and allowed to mix and match freely.
-
-
Explain to me how this is consistent with the proposition of hyperpluralism that all ideologies must be open, “mix and match freely.” This would mean not ignoring threats but “allowing” them to overtake. What is the limit of the (re)mix? Ignoring threats didn’t work well in 1937.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Key here is what is being meant by ideology. Critical definition is that ideology is precisely that which conceals itself as normative. It operates via repetition, not reason. “For they know what they do, but they do it anyway, and they love it.”<–Zizek’s remix of Slotjerdijk
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.