Conversation

Well shit, I talked myself into arguing against holistic thinking. Hofstadter got it wrong. The opposite of holism is not reductionism (that still inherits the well-posedness delusion of holism). The opposite is fragmentism (shardism? disconnectionism? muttism? discordianism?)
11
18
Reductionism is the belief that your solution to a problem will inevitably roll up into more complex solutions to bigger problems, all the way up to the problem of life, the universe and everything being 42.
1
9
Fragmentism by contrast, doesn't expect any sort of coherent roll-up of a localized solution to any problem to anything bigger, more holistic. It is not an integrationist view of differential bits of the universe. More strongly, it speculates that such roll-up is unnecessary
Replying to
Is fragmentation closer to decoupling, then? We often say “assume X is true, would Y or Z be better?” but we never go back and say “now assume we have no idea about X, is (Y or Z) still better?”
1
Replying to
Can you explain how it’s unnecessary? Pure reductionism doesn’t work because of emergence in complex systems. But understanding quantum is still useful in chemistry. Psychology informs economics etc. More complexity -> more local solutions
1