Pluralism is no longer strong enough to counter ideologism. We need hyperpluralism. If pluralism is a "live and let live" stance that acknowledges the right of all ideologies to exist, hyperpluralism requires all ideologies to be open-sourced and allowed to mix and match freely.
-
-
actions speak, which sounds like liberal tolerance + laissez faire geopolitics to me. and other existences need re/solving when they threaten to nuke/annihilate/destroy yours. regardless, boundaries + jurisidictions remain: who/what determines what is “my” piece?
-
You do. You have a better way of detecting bombs in churches, go for it and invent that. There is a difference between threatening any such big grand thing and actually being able to do that. You buying that posture of coherent grand threat is the main reason it is a threat.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.