Pluralism is no longer strong enough to counter ideologism. We need hyperpluralism. If pluralism is a "live and let live" stance that acknowledges the right of all ideologies to exist, hyperpluralism requires all ideologies to be open-sourced and allowed to mix and match freely.
-
-
A purebred ideology is like being forced to use a single tech platform for everything. The way some companies are "microsoft shops" for example. "Running he world" is no more a meaningfully single, unified problem than "running the enterprise". It's not fundamental physics.
Show this thread -
The more you can mix and match and come up with an unnamed cocktail of positions that don't necessarily fit together well, the more you'll be free to focus on actual problems. If it can be compressed into an axiomatic manifesto from which everything else can be derived, run.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What institutional (and maybe technological) setup could facilitate this?
-
It feels like centralized media and institutions lead to ideological monopolies or oligopolies. Today’s fragmentation has created plurality (to some extent) but still high degree of internal consistency and impermeability. How to add porosity?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.