I feel like any suitable definition will also comprehend the phenomenon of the “rock star intellectual”. For instance, Jordan Peterson is an intellectual. Of a funny American televangelist type. But I think he has to count. Otherwise you’ll just end up defining philosophy etc.
Sure, so long as he arrives on the island with a brain primed with received knowledge etc and choose too. But if he arrives there with only basic literacy and no such membership, and becomes the island's only expert on breadfruitology from scratch... he still counts for me
-
-
I think this is where our relative subject matter biases are showing. Subjects like history fundamentally need a symbolic tradition to work with as raw material. Many subjects don't need such a symbolizing base layer, just observation of the environment.
-
Like, Crusoe has no way to be a *historian* because there is no history on the island as such. He can be a natural historian and invent theories of how the island came to have the ecology it did, from scratch, but not a "people" historian.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah, which is actually the case of Mr Crusoe. This isn’t just a idle idea. Gramsci wrote his exegeses on Marxism from jail with few of any texts available to him. Ezra Pound also wrote the Cantos from prison.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
is a poor person’s idea of a rich person)