Conversation

If you exclude reading, writing, speaking, and listening (ie use of language, including math or code) as mere table stakes, how would you define “intellectual” in terms of essential non-language behaviors that non-intellectuals typically don’t exhibit?
60
66
Replying to
I see an intellectual as someone who explicitly places his or her writing and argumentation in dialog with a tradition (meaning: sequence) of other intellectuals who have written on the topics s/he is engaged with — references, in short
1
6
Replying to and
Of course, that’s not sufficient. When people think it is, that’s when you get the phenomenon of the poseur or the pseudo-intellectual, who goes through the motions of name-dropping for prestige purposes, but who has little original to add to the tradition.
1
2
Replying to
Hmm, that’s a coherent definition of one kind of intellectualism (traditional/scholastic/straussian). I have a feeling there’s at least a couple of other distinct types.
1
1
Replying to
I think of them as "take only pictures, leave only footprints" people. Some of my friends who have an intellectual orientation towards, and relationship with life, but don't situate themselves in tradition as a first order of business. Only as a side-effect
2
3
Replying to
Not necessarily. I'm characterizing the orientation in intensional terms via definitional behavioral constituents such as curiosity which others have pointed out. "Intellectuals are curious" like "water is wet". They try things. They forgo immediate reward. etc etc.
2
1
Replying to and
Csizentmihayi, in "Creativity", offers both kinds of definition. On one hand he defines creativity in terms of nexus of a field (people/tradition), a domain (subject), and an individual, and otoh, he characterizes it in terms of "complexity of thought." Extensional/intensional
Replying to
I agree that complexity (profundity? originality?) of thought is a qualifying condition. Compexity is also what justifies placing intellectuals within a hierarchy: the more complexity (hopefully but alas not always clearly expressed), the greater the intellectual achievement.
1