It's a point every researcher knows but surprisingly few have articulated well. Only good example I know of is Karl Weiss' "What Theory is Not, Theorizing Is" (it's about management research, but applies to any kind) https://www.jstor.org/stable/2393789
-
-
Show this thread
-
My "research" from back when I was doing the academic kind is in the form of half a dozen journal papers and a dozen or so conference papers. But the real thing was in the form of about a dozen 3-ring binders of handwritten notes on 1-sided used printer paper.
Show this thread -
Unfortunately, I recycled all those notes at some point because they were occupying too much shelf space. Wish I'd kept them. Re-reading my papers, I can't actually reconstruct my thinking path towards them, which was 90% of the value for me personally.
Show this thread -
In a way, for my current interests, twitter has replaced my 3-ring binder notebooks. So it's going to be preserved for better or worse :D It's an awful place to keep a research notebook, but it's better than many other places you could keep one.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
So much map so little territory
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
"politics"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Similar, if smaller gap, between software as it is developed, and as it is specified in large corporations. Whitepapers and interminable design review cycles, oh my.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What specific nerdy OCD behaviours?
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.