Adding canonical book references for the 4 quadrants in response to a question. If you can't afford to hire people, read these books.https://twitter.com/vgr/status/1118225740703526912 …
-
Show this thread
-
Lol, one reason my market is so small is that people who rely on hitchhiker's guide type material for help with life/career/management/leadership problems are unlikely to make it to high levels in orgs or be entrepreneurs. Fortunately enough make it through to provide me a living
2 replies 2 retweets 19 likesShow this thread -
Hmm... I think the US has generally lost confidence in itself, so long-term I may need to think about moving to a country that has more confidence in itself if this recession in the systematic doubt market continues much longer
2 replies 0 retweets 18 likesShow this thread -
Another addendum: note that this is all agnostic to functional domain (marketing, org behavior, product dev, leadership, risk mgmt etc etc) and industry. Having competence a reasonable coverage zone along those 2 dimensions is table stakes.
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likesShow this thread -
Obv. some (function, industry) pairs produce more problems in some quadrants than in others, so you should pick industry+functional areas to build knowledge and experience in that match your fundamental offering strength.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
Venkatesh Rao Retweeted Noah Rosenberg
Okay, this comment from
@nrose made me realize there's a very good test of whether you're naturally better at boosting systematic confidence or boosting systematic doubt. The diagnostic question is: are you a connector or separator?https://twitter.com/nrose/status/1118230451875909634 …Venkatesh Rao added,
Noah Rosenberg @nroseReplying to @vgrthis 2x2 is the foundation of Integral theory (and DISC theory) and also I've seen it expressed as serotonin/dopamine, also forest/trees or global/analytical. Also rumsfeldian (unknown unknowns). Which means there's prior art for how you can profile and segment a good lead.1 reply 0 retweets 16 likesShow this thread -
Connectors see similarities/rhymes among mental models and use the basic reasoning pattern "A is pretty much the same as B therefore just choose the frame convenient for you". You build confidence by hedgehoggy unification. If you can unify 2 things but use only 1, 2x confidence
2 replies 1 retweet 18 likesShow this thread -
Separators try to separate similar things by poking at what makes them different. This increases doubt, through disunification. What you are confident of understanding/doing gets put in a smaller box, and the net unknown in your world goes up.
1 reply 1 retweet 25 likesShow this thread -
I have a strong separator bias, to the point of pedantry when I get really interested, and often go nuts making up elaborate 2x2 separation schemes to distinguish things. Long-time clients kinda indulge me a bit even when it isn't useful to them because they know I enjoy it.
8 replies 0 retweets 34 likesShow this thread -
Another dimension is people who actually want a benefit/change from consulting and people who want to pretend there is a change from consulting business really just let us keeping going as we were.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
I try to avoid that crowd
-
-
Wise of you, but there is a ton of money to be made in the pretend-to-change consulting field. And much head banging by those who don't recognize the wall there.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.