Diet calories are an example of anti-reification: an abstraction made real via a non-abstraction. A measure of homeostasis shifts in a complex dissipative system that rhymes enough with a unit of literal energy to be approximated by it. Like using pulse rate to measure time.
Conversation
Replying to
I follow a bunch of people who get REALLY mad about diet calories being used as though they were like literal calories. It’s hilarious because they’re so right they’re wrong. Anti-reification in a complex system is something like a fractal-hermetic heuristic. “As above so below.”
1
4
This is an unpopular opinion, but I think this conflation of real and homeostasis “calories” is a GOOD thing and one of the ways we can make sense of complex systems. The trick is to recalibrate the 2 calories when dynamic regimes change.
1
1
1
This is actually a common procedure in designing feedback controllers for complex systems. You have a family of tuned simple linear laws that overlap along the nonlinear range of system behavior. Kinda like automatic gears in a car give you a smooth acceleration response.
3
3
There’s lots of other examples of anti-reification. It’s a sort of scale-free mathematical metonymy. If I use notation “ar” for anti-reification:
Pulse = ar(clock time)
Body temperature =ar(98.4 degrees)
CO2 level in atmosphere = ar(400ppm) and rising
1
Basically, if you get mad about “calories are fake” you might be... a rationalist 😱😆
2
Replying to
A calorie is a unit of energy.
the energy needed to raise the temperature of 1 gram of water through 1 °C (now usually defined as 4.1868 joules).
Your word salad is overdressed.

