Again — and I keep repeating myself because it is both true and tempting to ignore — no moral judgment here. This is just how the lifecycle of organizations works. Particular institutional deaths may or may not represent net loss of societal wealth.
-
Show this thread
-
To go macro, I’m not even asserting particular broad outcomes as desirable or not. Perhaps the whole industrial institutional landscape needs burning to the ground, perhaps only 5% of the worst rot needs cutting out. There’s probably an upper burn limit for successful recovery.
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likesShow this thread -
All this of course assumes there is some degree of governance and restraint possible on the cancel side; that it is a true public capable of some deliberation and conscious choices; that it is not always a zombie mob of true believers led by psycho authoritarians.
1 reply 2 retweets 9 likesShow this thread -
If it is, then this is all moot. It’s a zombie apocalypse, and the vampire elites have to go into hiding while the humans band into family-structured units for everything.
2 replies 4 retweets 11 likesShow this thread -
To complete the analogy, the libertarian werewolf packs think they’ll inherit the world after the vampires and zombies destroy each other and they eat the humans on the way to their Galtian fortresses, but they’re mostly weresheep in practice and can be safely ignored as NPCs.
1 reply 4 retweets 23 likesShow this thread -
Final point: I haven’t said much about the target class of cancel culture, unaccountable institutional elites of some sort. The ones analogous to extractive vampire-farmers in this convoluted mixed metaphor. They are harder to generalize about since they are more varied.
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
Raging zombies are all alike, every predatory vampire is predatory in its own way. Universities, Hollywood, gaming communities, legislative bodies, corporations, courts, each is extractively destroyed in its own way.
1 reply 2 retweets 12 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @vgr
vampires and zombies are what the upper and lower class look like from a middle-class perspective (people who can't be held accountable to middle-class social norms). Werewolfs/shapeshifters/body snatchers are people who appear to be bound by those rules but are not
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
anyone can become a zombie by deciding overtly not to play by the rules anymore. Anyone can become a werewolf by doing the same thing but stealthily
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
when i say middle class i mean middle class of a particular world (universities, celebrity, etc). Anyone opting out of a world looks the same (zombie) because they join the mass of ungoverned humanity.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Not really. Zombies in my metaphor are not opt-out types, but powerless lower strata insiders who *can’t* opt out easily.
-
-
Replying to @vgr
was trying to stretch to include opioid epidemic types at the bottom—you're describing someone who is opting out of playing by the rules but is still ultimately wants the system to succeed. so... Pitchfork mob? kind of zombie-lite (less punchy for your purposes, probably a no go)
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.