In romanticism, energy of poiesis runs ahead of formal discipline. In classicism the reverse is true. The hobbyist sensibility though, has "discipline" in a different sense, and it has a poiesis energy that is somehow quiet and contained, yet still messy and unruly wrt discipline
-
-
Show this thread
-
The idea that the hobbyist sensibility is not serious, or in some way dilettantish or lower-skilled is not true. There can be ferocious focus and extreme capability at work.
Show this thread -
Perhaps the main difference is that the hobbyist sensibility lacks a public, historicist ambition. It is content for whatever it accomplishes to be forgotten. This takes something out of the public versions of the same activities.
Show this thread -
For a while, I thought the hobbyist sensibility lacked a strong praxis component. After all, it tends to gravitate towards snowflakey enrichment/play activities. But this again is not true. Many hobbyist activities involve really tricky practical problems.
Show this thread -
For example, hobby electronics involves all the messy practicality and real-world crap of professional electronics as an employee at a corporation. I think the difference is lack of deadlines.
Show this thread -
The hobbyist sensibility is "I'm not trying to make history or even money. This will take as long as it takes." So perhaps, the 2x2 here is classicist vs. romantic and with/without deadlines. Though I think hobbyist sensibilities tend to romantic-without-deadlines.
Show this thread -
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
hell no
- Show replies
-
-
-
Leisurely?
-
Yes, that's in the word cloud somewhere
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.