TLDR of anarchist (Feyerabend) philosophy of science as opposed to “scientific method”. If you think of science as a method, you’re more likely to build a bureaucracy of science than do science. Science is peculiarly vulnerable to turpentine effects.
Conversation
Replying to
Yes that’s the starting point of my post which I linked. Never mind. We’re talking past each other.
1
Replying to
Yes and it builds on conclusion in my post on how that happens, Picasso notwithstanding, in the form of science bureaucracy. Those who can’t do the science move to working on management tools for it.

