TLDR of anarchist (Feyerabend) philosophy of science as opposed to “scientific method”. If you think of science as a method, you’re more likely to build a bureaucracy of science than do science. Science is peculiarly vulnerable to turpentine effects.https://www.ribbonfarm.com/2010/03/18/the-turpentine-effect/ …
Yes that’s the starting point of my post which I linked. Never mind. We’re talking past each other.
-
-
when you say fields are “vulnerable” to turpentine effects, that’s a strong implication that it’s a bad thing. is that not what you mean?
-
Yes and it builds on conclusion in my post on how that happens, Picasso notwithstanding, in the form of science bureaucracy. Those who can’t do the science move to working on management tools for it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.