There’s a family of interesting related arguments: “You are not enough people” (Vonnegut theory of marital conflict) “Reality has a surprising amount of detail” (John Salvatier theory of physical reality) “Everything is harder than it looks” (David Wong theory of effort shock)
-
Show this thread
-
I cite these a lot, but in case you haven’t seen these ideas before, go read them now. Links: https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/300997-ok-now-let-s-have-some-fun-let-s-talk-about-sex … http://johnsalvatier.org/blog/2017/reality-has-a-surprising-amount-of-detail …http://www.cracked.com/article_18544_how-the-karate-kid-ruined-modern-world.html …
2 replies 0 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
These are all in some sense the opposite of “unreasonable effectiveness of X” arguments. Instead of surprisingly more leverage than you think, X gives you unsurprisingly *less* leverage than you hope.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
If you haven’t seen the “unreasonable effectiveness” genre of philosophizing, links: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Unreasonable_Effectiveness_of_Mathematics_in_the_Natural_Sciences … https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.com/en//pubs/archive/35179.pdf … http://karpathy.github.io/2015/05/21/rnn-effectiveness/ … https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.03924
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
Vonnegut: being married gets you a smaller fraction of the social connection you need than you hope Salvatier: Foundational first-principles knowledge tells you less about the world than you hope Wong: Having a worthy goal and talent is a smaller part of “doing” than you hope
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likesShow this thread -
These are all special cases of “the entirely reasonable ineffectiveness of hope” Entirely reasonable ineffectiveness of true love Entirely reasonable ineffectiveness of true knowledge Entirely reasonable ineffectiveness of true purpose Each “true X” is a hope in disguise.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
You’ll often see the hope articulated in lofty sentimental assertions. “Love is all you need” “Truth conquers all” “Unwavering purpose overcomes all” Each is of course reversible by a satirical truth. No hope survives first contact with the associated reality intact.
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likesShow this thread -
Overloading Wong’s notion of effort shock, and his reference to training montages, each of these hopes is a sort of montage shock. In a movie, the shocking part would be a wishful montage sequence. The grind turns to 5 minutes of fun set to music.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread
It’s a basic trick of narrative engineering: validate false hopes by obscuring entirely reasonable hard parts with musical montages. I don’t know what to do with this generalization. This is the entirely reasonable ineffectiveness of mere tweeting.
-
-
Vaguely rhyming principle: reality is far less sexy than aesthetes hope. Conceptual fantasy art is dripping with 10x more sexiness than reality.
0 replies 0 retweets 5 likesShow this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.