Conversation

Show replies
Replying to
Ongoing, unconscious incuriousness toward self-serving conclusions and evidence that might contradict + reflexive denial of any other viewpoint? E.g. "I don't need to read Darwin to know evolution is wrong" - existing belief strong enough to overwhelm any future info; why read?
2
2
Replying to and
If I know evolution is true and I outwardly signal otherwise, to me, that's just lying (perhaps a different kind of bad faith) I think my formulation is more common, but that's probably just my incuriousness 😂
1
Replying to
a defensive move to distract, delay, and obfuscate an argument in which you know that your position is purely self-serving at the expense of others and indifensible on the grounds of common humanity, which is a principle you plan to subvert for as long as you can get away with it
Embedded video
GIF
1