All "meaning-making" products/services are evolving relationships between people that are on average 1/3 harvesting existing mutual credit, 1/3 instant gratification, 1/3 creating mutual debt through promise. It's like people pay to overcome barrier potentials and get entangled
-
-
Also, older post, Bargaining with Your Right Brainhttps://www.ribbonfarm.com/2008/03/16/bargaining-with-your-right-brain/ …
Show this thread -
I'm fascinated by how people weave financial relationships and human relationships. People like Graeber (Debt) seem to see the former as fundamentally a contaminant of the latter, with "illegible credit" that's really just entangled lives as the gold standard (heh!) of relating.
Show this thread -
There is something to that position. Money injected into a relationship without thought is 10x more likely to screw it up than strengthen or deepen it. But it's possible. Arguably, a good marriage is in fact Exhibit A of the possibility.
Show this thread -
Blockchains are kinda the other extreme of money in some sense. Possibility of completely decoupling financial and human relationships. Though I can't think of examples. Just seems possible. Money in/value out without either individual humans or "branded" orgs as counterparty.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.