Sigh. I’m not looking for examples of institutions that do this, or processes for selecting. I’m interested in *your specific choices* and the preferences they reveal. Also, no, I’m not actually involved in such a thing. It’s a thought experiment.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I elect
@ctbeiser and@maxkreminski ! -
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
can't you just pick out poor but productive researchers?
-
I’m interested in your revealed criteria, via specific nominations, not my own
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
No I’m talking about your specific shortlist candidates
End of conversation
-
-
-
I want him to write a brief history of failed policy evaluations since 1960, the stuff that didn’t work in social policy, I think it would be an extremely valuable book.
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@gregeganSF Jurgen Schmidhuber You (I know you said that already, but I've thought about it unprompted for years now) -
+1 for Schmidhuber. Stuck with me for over a decade since I first watched a youtube lecture of his on computational creativity. He explained his name is pronounced: "your again, shmit hoober"
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.