A problem with novels that constitute large imaginary worlds is you can’t just read the “best” ones. You have to read some bad ones to grok the gestalt of the world so you can enjoy the best ones. Writters of good worlds seem to hit a useful mediocrity in all individual books
Conversation
The larger the world, the higher the variance. Harry Potter is very good in Prisoner of Azkaban, pretty lousy in Goblet of Fire, mediocre for the remaining 5. Good distribution. That’s about the limit I think. With more than 7 volumes it would get ugly.
2
2
