Economies of scale are economies of learning. To learn, you *must* intend to scale to the minimum size necessary for the payoff to be positive.
-
-
Show this thread
-
A thing feels like "maintenance" when you're forced to keep learning long after you've abandoned all intentions of growing. Taxes are the prototypical example of this kind of desire-limited learning vector.
Show this thread -
The more arbitrary the "learning" the stronger this effect. Learning feels arbitrary when there is a big distance between the foundational principles and what you need to know to apply them. Consider gap between understanding the Laffer curve and the 1040 form.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Is this (no incentive) only because the learning can not be reapplied in the future? That is seldom the case, no? Even (short) time bound learning can be tactical learning for long term problems?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Feels like when in organizations everybody wants to innovate safely. You can't do that, maybe limit the scope in time or resources, but innovating needs unlearning and then learning. A lot can go wrong.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.