Apparently you attract the elderly.
-
-
-
err birth order is not age, you can be eldest child and 5 years old
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
2.2 is most common size so possible configs are: 1 12 123 Oldest = 3/6 = 50% of all possible slots Youngest = 2/6 = 33% Middle <= 1/6 <= 16%
-
No, doesn't work, the first one would vote "only child", and your triangle is misleading because youngest could be either 2 or 3 in the order, so equal probability of oldest and youngest from n>1 sets. You should see symmetric youngest/oldest, and unpredictable singles and middle
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah, weird
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah slatestar gets the same thing. I think he and
@vgr have quite similar followings though
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Really curious now for: 1) much larger sample pool size 2) age distribution of same respondents 3) various other factors that could potentially explain the responses (tech sector adjacency, geographic region, cultural background..)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Don't you cater to people with entrepreneurial mindsets? Those people tend to be independent, self-starters who are comfortable with pioneering alone. (Hasn't it been shown that entrepreneurs tend to be 1st born?) Thus, anyone who wrote for entrepreneurs would see that skew?
-
Yeah, possibly. I don't have an explanation. I have other people insisting to me that birth order effects don't exist.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.