When presented with a party line of positions, you should pick at least 1/3 to oppose on principle. If you find yourself agreeing with all of them and unable to identify a 1/3 where you could reasonably break ranks you need cult deprogramming school.
-
-
I agree that slavish consistency with past positions is foolish, but incoherence can claim anything as a result of inconsistency (logically, ~True -> anything) and so in fact claims nothing. People can decide to be incoherent, but claims they make on that basis should be ignored.
-
That’s not much of a real problem right now. Pathological, cancerous consistency is the far bigger problem.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.