I'm becoming more snobby about work than I can probably afford to be from a financial perspective. Like Sherlock Holmes, I require "singular features" to take a case. I can spot the consulting equivalent of a "evidence of cheating spouse for a divorce case" a mile off now.
-
-
The only ways to make them “interesting” is to a) add more money b) add more unmodelable risk c) add an interpersonal caring dimension for someone you like/love or dislike/hate d) add a self-care dimension (proving yourself after self-esteem blow, healing narcissistic wound)
Show this thread -
If $ and risk don’t motivate you, you have to either find the remaining 10% of problems or go into other fields. I’d say 90% of the 10% interesting business problems (ie 9% of total) are at VP+ levels, but the 1% lurking lower down food chain are the very best problems.
Show this thread -
Unless you find this 10%, almost any other field has a higher proportion of “interesting” Engineering/Art: 30-80% interesting Housework: 20-40% interesting Even the *boring* parts are more interesting. Routine tech calculations, “laying pipe” in novel writing, folding laundry
Show this thread -
Typical “90% boring part” problems: dealing with problem coworker/boss/report, navigating a tedious political conflict involving people you don’t give a shit about, interpreting sales data, reading balance sheets, rerunning a spreadsheet model for the 4th year in a row.
Show this thread -
People are generally paid in proportion to how much boredom they take on. And the boredom is a mark of competence by the way. Anyone who loves these problems past n=3 is likely cluelessly awful at dealing with them. Their incompetence lends interestingness to routine stuff.
Show this thread -
In 2019, with everybody either exhorting you to “learn to code” or “become an entrepreneur” it is good to know why neither might fit you. Coding is easy to eliminate. You find out fairly quickly the hard way (6-12 months) whether you have a feel for it and are good at it.
Show this thread -
Entrepreneurship is harder. The primary qualification is the courage to be bored for long periods of time without getting distracted. At least 5 years. Like, 90% of the time until an org of people to do the boring bits exists under your authoritah. I lack this.
Show this thread -
If you’re not bored by the 90% you lack the imagination to solve the 10%. If you don’t have the courage you won’t endure 5 years of boredom. Life FOMO will claim you (“there’s got to be more to life than playing half a dozen games that seem to involve gearing ‘no’ repeatedly!”)
Show this thread -
And if you eliminate both coding and entrepreneurship what’s left? Everything else.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.