Conversation

Replying to
The BIG problem is that many believe such transitions ARE in fact unavoidably collapse complete and *still* want them. Effectively they want to bunker down with civilizational crown jewels/reboot plans, let us other 99% subhumans die off, and emerge from bat caves to rule in 2119
2
16
These are awful people, but they do exist, do hold such views and serious power, and do in fact react with glee to progress in BTFSTTG (burn the fucking shit to the ground) plans. 200 years ago BTFSTTG was a silly dream. In 2019, it could actually be done (reboot not guaranteed)
1
8
Now we technological pragmatists still want to get to nice decentralized future outcomes, but we want to muddle through, in a messy, constant “under construction” slouching-towards-utopia way. We don’t want to blow it all up. We don’t want to BTFSTTG along the way.
1
9
This is why the shutdown concern me. This isn’t like previous shutdowns. This is a shutdown with a lot of BTFSTTG types in power. Their BATNA (best alternative to a negotiated agreement) is collapse. Maybe not ATC, but they’d like to see a lot of stack realities collapse for good
2
11
Sure the risk of a crash caused by a fatigued unpaid controller moonlighting driving Lyft, leading to a strike, is low. But I bet there’s BTFSTTG people thinking “we could use a gory crash to force privatization of ATC, on the road to automation and eventual elimination. Win!”
2
2
Government shrinkage by starvation collapse —> privatize —> automate. Gut what you can, when you can to transition it to your utopian state via crash chaos. There’s people in power who actually want lots of things to break and not be fixed. Reaganomics but with violent sadism.
1
8
This is why, though I actually share many libertarian and ancap end goals, I don’t identify as either. I think most of them fetishize technology in illiterate sci-fi ways, understand it in micro bits that makes them overconfident about macro things, and are basically sadists.
2
21
Starting a slide towards a Hobbesian world because they think they can come out the other end as winners. Because they’re idiots who think because they’re rich, they must be smart. Because they like apocalypse movies, they must be like The Rock themselves.
1
14
Am I overstating things? Well, here we are, talking about diverting actual disaster relief funds to build a symbolic wall and wondering if it will take an airplane crash to get governance back, by people who will then predictably exploit the tragedy to burn more things down.
1
18
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Replying to
I’ve always found that to be an irrelevant tautological point. Meh. Move on. We’re in 2019 not 1787. Wheels still roll as designed in 4000 BC or whenever. Not important unless you fetishize them Founding Fathers of Wheels.
Replying to
Agree w/ analysis, except you confuse decentralized with distributed. The former = no single point of central control, which allows airports as natural points of control in a overall decentralized architecture. Distributed is the airplanes coordinating peer-to-peer
1
Replying to
Interesting thread.I think more evidence of B..G is open calls for eliminating the electoral college and constitutional amendments,people being elected calling for socialism, CIC's stating they'll fundamentally change the US w/o debate.
1
1