Is English an exception in how efficiently it deals with relatives by marriage (*-in-law)? Russian, for example, has at least a dozen narrowly specific words in that linguistic corner.
Conversation
Replying to
Yeah Hindi too has a dozen specific words. The in-law construct is genius. It generalizes very nicely. I for instance, inherited a cat-in-law in 2005. Works for objects too. That's my car-in-law, etc.
Replying to
Could it be that this efficiency (and many others in English) is the ultimate cause of its domination? Because Anglophones in aggregate pay the lowest cognitive-cultural taxes, in the post-Enlightenment era when such taxation started to make real difference?
1
1
Replying to
Irregular verbs otoh are very inefficient until you learn them. A thousand corner cases. English has a deep moat of those.
2
Show replies

