2 kids found 2 similar boxes. They opened box 1. It contained a cookie. Kid 1 immediately grabbed it and started eating it, saying “the other box probably has a cookie too; that one is yours” (proposition A)
-
Show this thread
-
By the time kid 2 got box 2 open and discovered it contained a lump of coal, kid 1 had eaten the cookie. Between the first bite of the cookie and the discovery of the lump of coal, both kids inhabited a reality where proposition A was assumed to be true.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
This is what it means for a reality to be constructed out of the benefit of doubt. The brief period where Prop A *might* have been true was also the period when kid 1 was *really* eating the cookie.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
In modal logic terms, the cookie was eaten in all possible worlds (P: ▢ the cookie is eaten by kid A) but there was a second cookie only in *some* possible worlds (Q: ⋄ There is a cookie). In between was world W where both P and Q were true for period T.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
But the thing is, we spend 100% of our time in realities like W comprising true-in-all-worlds and true-in-some-worlds beliefs, *and acting as though both kinds of belief are the same*
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likesShow this thread -
Edit: Q: ⋄ There is a second cookie P and Q together describe the world that is holistically committed to by kid 1 asserting Prop A *while actually eating the cookie* (the eating is part of the assertion) I’ll clean up the logic when I write this up somewhere cleanly
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
The thing is, in this toy example, it’s easy to separate speculative ⋄ beliefs from actually-the-case ▢ beliefs at a granular level. In practice, we navigate by millions of beliefs, most of them either unconscious, or unsorted into the two kinds of beliefs, or both.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likesShow this thread -
You live in a cognitive house built of 2 types of bricks: ▢ and ⋄. But you rarely look at the walls as ⋄‘s turn into either ▢ or epistemic holes. Until the whole house is on the brink of collapse.
3 replies 1 retweet 5 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Not really. Does not scale. Works at the margins for a handful of high impact beliefs but not for the meat and potatoes beliefs of reality
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.