In fact it badly distorts politics of many groups. To the extent constructing and using the term “POC” signals valuing solidarity and a manufactured class consciousness, it is broadly socialist/modernist in spirit and unrepresentative of (for example) Asian trad/right wing etc.
Conversation
Ironically, intersectionality is a good framework for appreciating this. People of “color” are still “people” first, and as likely to lean right, fascist, racist, libertarian etc as whites, given appropriate socioeconomic contexts. Erasing adversaries creates blindspot perils.
1
1
4
I believe people who like the term have sincere motives. Sure, people who are victims of structural oppression are disproportionately non-white. But correlation is not causation. By using a ‘color coalition’ as a proxy for socioeconomic oppression you’re hurting your cause.
1
1
1
You *lose* natural allies (poor/oppressed whites) and fall for tactics of opponents: the divide between poor blacks and poor whites propped up for 150 years since civil war by the rich.
And by casting a wide net, you *gain* unwilling/unsympathetic bycatch who will weaken you.
1
1
4
I’m broadly left-libertarian, with strong sympathy for people suffering from poverty, poor health, lack of education etc. To the extent skin color is a very strong multiplier I take it seriously, but not symbolically. It’s a good analysis variable but a terrible symbolizing one.
1
2
Forget Asians, who are more likely to not fit politics implied by ‘POC’ than fit. Even rich blacks/Hispanics are likely going to be misfits in ways that seriously undermine intent (for example take roles intended to represent but not actually do so because of ‘white’ incentives)
1
1
Someone (I think ) joked that what America needs is a class war, not a culture war. I’d rather not have a war at all, but I agree if we must have one, a “class war” (though not necessarily constructed in socialist terms) is a healthier one to have.
1
9
One reason I think is a net healthy addition to the political stage, despite being skeptical of her economic policies is that she seems to be pursuing this class-over-culture framing. Not saying drop cultural identity. Just don’t make it the flag/symbolizing variable.
1
3
15
Tldr: it’s your choice whether to use the term. It doesn’t offend me, but it does not serve me either. It represents a slight negative utility which I would tolerate if I thought it was at least helping people who needed help, but it doesn’t do that either.
So I don’t use it.
2
8
Replying to
since you're on this, can I ask: what is your general impression of how i'm doing with what i'm doing on this front / these matters
1
1
Replying to
my instinct is that my long-term trajectory is probably gonna be something like 'global brown diaspora guy', imo something trevor noah -ish
1
Show replies

