“Growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of the cancer blog” With apologies to Edward Abbey. I’m turning into a media environmentalist. The longer I do this the more useless/toxic big numbers seem to me. The sheer lack of imagination offends me more than anything else.
-
-
Money is a bs excuse for pursuing growth because a) most of you will make very little money directly from size effects b) if profitability were only about size we’d all be blue whales eating krill. We fetishize growth as an aesthetic. There is rarely a good reason for it.
Show this thread -
I’ve been as guilty of growthist thinking in the past as anyone, but what saved me from the cancer of growthism is mediocrity, to be frank, not any particularly virtuous digital-environmentalist intentions. I’ve just never been energetic enough to work at SEO or growth hacks.
Show this thread -
My little media slumlord empire built around ribbonfarm isn’t in the greatest of shapes, I’ll be the first to admit. It’s got a dadbod like me, shall we say. But I think I can assert it’s free of growthism cancer at least.
Show this thread -
-
Addendum: the only rational reason to be growthist is if you want to build a beef-only media property intended solely for “military” use, to beat up on other properties. Then you need to get as big as biggest opponents, as fast as possible. This may or not be a cancerous goal.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If advertising metrics were properly calculated, 10 of the most powerful readers would be higher value than 10M of the least.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.