People who want to theorize post-consumerism fail because they fail to identify a strong positive-valence, positive-feedback alternative to "convenience" as a driving attribute of material life. Behavioral attribute, not value/virtue. "Clean" or "environment friendly" ain't it.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @vgr
This is really interesting and very relevant to some discussions I’ve been having with friends in the
#transitiondesign community. I fully agree that transition from consumerism/capitalism to someting more sustainable can’t be solely based on virtue, sacrifice or enforcement.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @j_camachor @vgr
However, I don’t believe we only consume to maximize the attribute of convenience. Thus, the challenge is more complex: to find (and play with) as many alternative postive-valence, positive-feedback attributes as the ones that currently keep us consuming.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @j_camachor
I think it's the main one. To the point that it trumps other ones when there is a contest (eg. people going to a foreign country and eating at McDonalds rather than deal with the inconvenience of figuring out interesting local options). Convenience is code for "least resistance"
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @vgr
I think it’s the main one in something like “western capitalist modernity.” Arguably, it doesn’t always/everywhere has been or will be like that.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Yes that was my implied scope... and it's spreading to the rest of the world because of lack of alternatives. Middle-classization = convenienceization. In China, it's already the dominant ethos of WeChat. In India it's getting underway in a big way.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.