There are two ways to bring these nuclear reactor “normal accident” topics into “safe study” zone. First: add more methodological rigor burdens in proportion to risk to others. IRB++. But this won’t be enough to bring more responsibility to say casual speculative tweeting.
-
Show this thread
-
I like the second approach: increase direct risk exposure (or lower moral hazard). You want a million dollar research grant to study race and IQ? Go for it. We just ask that you live in a black inner city school district while doing so, that will be applying your findings.
3 replies 0 retweets 32 likesShow this thread -
You want to speculate about sex markets? Great, do it in a sociology department where you have more female peers than male. Better still: include them in proposal. Get skin in the game in proportion to the accidental harm you might do to others.
1 reply 2 retweets 53 likesShow this thread -
The common response to free-expression absolutism is “freedom of expression is not freedom from consequences”... as in don’t expect people to not yell at you or retaliate. If only it were that simple. The real messy problem is *others may not be free from consequences*
1 reply 5 retweets 41 likesShow this thread -
To bring it back to the opening point, how do you judge a thinker? By topic, not method. How by topic? If a thinker routinely indulges in morally hazardous thinking where others are more likely to be hurt by erroneous conclusions, I do a double take.
1 reply 2 retweets 37 likesShow this thread -
If they aren’t adding extra safety or taking on extra risk to compensate, I flip the bozobit. I’m doing this more quickly these days. There’s no excuse for putting others at risk with your bad thinking from relative safety.
3 replies 1 retweet 35 likesShow this thread -
I’m fine with sloppy speculative spitballing and casual, loud, public thinking. That’s my own modus operandi after all. The trick is to then work on harmless topics and/or ones where you yourself are the one most at risk. If you want to move to meltdown topics, harden you methods
8 replies 9 retweets 67 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @vgr
This is a helpful model which I hadn't heard before. Thanks.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
-
Replying to @vgr @michael_nielsen
So you choose the topic of judging people?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
yup, all people, so I bear as much risk as anyone
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
